Field Note 13
Sometimes the shift is subtle.
A conversation becomes an argument.
An observation becomes an accusation.
Curiosity becomes certainty.
And somewhere along the way, the “we” disappears.
Instead of:
“We do this.”
It becomes:
“They do this.”
The difference may seem small, but it changes the feeling of the entire conversation.
When we remain inside the circle, we are exploring something together.
We are looking at a shared human tendency.
A blind spot.
A habit.
A pattern.
When we step outside the circle, it becomes easier to diagnose than to understand.
Easier to point than to participate.
This doesn’t mean every perspective is equally true.
It doesn’t mean we should ignore harmful behavior or abandon discernment.
But there is often a difference between noticing a pattern and appointing ourselves above it.
One invites reflection.
The other invites defense.
Most of us know what it feels like to be misunderstood.
Most of us know what it feels like to be certain and later discover we were missing part of the picture.
Most of us know what it feels like to learn something that changed our perspective.
The “we” lives there.
Not in agreement.
In shared humanity.
Perhaps part of discernment is remembering that the things we notice in others are often part of the same human experience we are trying to understand in ourselves.
Not always.
But often enough to remain humble.
Sometimes the fastest way to lose a conversation is to lose the “we.”
And sometimes the fastest way to find understanding is to bring it back.

Leave a comment